http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13lGuuebvfg
Thanks to Jim R. for this link.
Thursday, September 28, 2006
Sunday, September 24, 2006
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
911 Conspiracy Theories
Thanks again to Bob T. for this.
By a writer who I often think takes extreme positions, a well thought out article.
The Nation September 25, 2006 :THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY NUTS by Alexander Cockburn. You trip over one fundamental idiocy of the 9/11 conspiracy nuts in the first paragraph of the book by one of their high priests, David Ray Griffin,The New Pearl Harbor. "In many respects," Griffin writes, "the strongest evidence provided by critics of the official account involves the events of 9/11 itself.... In light of standard procedures for dealing with hijacked airplanes...not one of these planes should have reached its target, le talone all three of them."The operative word here is "should." One central characteristic of the nuts is that they have a devout, albeit preposterous, belief in American efficiency, and hence many of them start with the racist premise that "Arabs in caves" weren't capable of the mission. They believe that military systemswork the way Pentagon press flacks and aerospace salesmen say they shouldwork. They believe that at 8:14 am, when AA Flight 11 switched off its radioand transponder, an FAA flight controller should have called the NationalMilitary Command center and NORAD. They believe, citing reverently (thisfrom high priest Griffin) "the US Air Force's own website," that an F-15could have intercepted AA Flight 11 "by 8:24, and certainly no later than8:30."They appear to have read no military history, which is too bad because ifthey had they'd know that minutely planned operations--let alone responses to an unprecedented emergency--screw up with monotonous regularity, by reason of stupidity, cowardice, venality and other whims of Providence.According to the minutely prepared plans of the Strategic Air Command, animpending Soviet attack would have prompted the missile silos in NorthDakota to open and the ICBMs to arc toward Moscow and kindred targets. Thetiny number of test launches actually attempted all failed, whereupon SAC gave up testing. Was it badly designed equipment, human incompetence,defense contractor venality or... conspiracy? Did the April 24, 1980, effortto rescue the hostages in the US Embassy in Tehran fail because a sandstormdisabled three of the eight helicopters, or because agents of William Casey poured sugar into their gas tanks in yet another conspiracy?Do the military's varying attempts to explain why F-15s didn't intercept andshoot down the hijacked planes stem from predictable attempts to cover upthe usual screw-ups, or because of conspiracy? Is Mr. Cohen in his littlestore at the end of the block hiking his prices because he wants to make abuck, or because his rent just went up, or because the Jews want to takeover the world? Bebel said anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools. Thesedays the 9/11 conspiracy fever is fast becoming the "socialism" of the left.My in-box overflows each day with fresh "proofs" of how the towers were demolished. I meet people who start quietly, asking me what I think about9/11. What they are actually trying to find out is whether I'm part of th ecoven. I imagine it is like being a normal Stoic in the second century ADgoing for a stroll in the forum and meeting some fellow asking, with seeming casualness, whether it's possible to feed 5,000 people on five loaves of bread and a couple of fish.Indeed, at my school the vicar used to urge on us Frank Morison's book WhoMoved the Stone? It demonstrated, with exhaustive citation from the Gospels,that since on these accounts no human had moved the stone from in front ofJoseph of Arimathea's tomb, it must have been an angel who rolled it aside,so Jesus could exit, astonish the mourners and then ascend. Of course,Morison didn't allow the possibility that angels never existed or that theGospel writers were making it up.It's the same pattern with the 9/11 nuts. There are photos of the impact ofthe "object" that hit the Pentagon--i.e., the Boeing 757, Flight 77--thatseem to show the sort of hole a missile might make. Ergo, it was a missileand a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon. As regards the hole, my brotherAndrew--writing a book about Rumsfeld--has seen photos taken within thirtyminutes of impact clearly showing the outline of an entire plane, includingwings. This was visible as soon as the smoke blew away.And if it was a missile, what happened to the 757? Did the conspiratorsshoot it down somewhere else, or force it down and then kill the passengers?Why plan to demolish the towers with pre-placed explosives if yourconspiracy includes control of the two planes that hit them? Why bother withthe planes at all? Why blame Osama if your fall guy is Saddam Hussein?The demolition scenario is classic who-moved-the-stonery. The towers didn't fall because they were badly built as a consequence of corruption,incompetence, regulatory evasions by the Port Authority and because theywere struck by huge planes loaded with jet fuel. No, they collapsed because Dick Cheney's agents methodically planted demolition charges in thepreceding days. It was a conspiracy of thousands, all of whom--party to massmurder--have held their tongues ever since.Of course, the buildings didn't suddenly pancake. People inside who survived the collapse didn't hear a series of explosions. As discussed in Wayne Barrett and Dan Collins's marvelous Grand Illusion, about Rudy Giuliani and9/11, helicopter pilots radioed warnings nine minutes before the final collapse of the South Tower that it might well go down, and similarwarnings, repeatedly, as much as twenty-five minutes before the NorthTower's fall.What Barrett and Collins brilliantly show are the actual corrupt conspiracies on Giuliani's watch (see also their article in this issue); the favoritism to Motorola, which saddled the firemen with radios that didn't work; the ability of the Port Authority to scrimp on fire protection; the mayor's catastrophic failure in the years before 9/11 to organize an effective emergency command, meaning that many lives could have been saved,cops and firemen could have communicated and firemen could have heard the helicopter warnings and the Mayday messages that saved most of the police.That's the real world, in which Giuliani and others have never been held accountable. Instead, the conspiracy nuts have combined to produce a ludicrous distraction.
By a writer who I often think takes extreme positions, a well thought out article.
The Nation September 25, 2006 :THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY NUTS by Alexander Cockburn. You trip over one fundamental idiocy of the 9/11 conspiracy nuts in the first paragraph of the book by one of their high priests, David Ray Griffin,The New Pearl Harbor. "In many respects," Griffin writes, "the strongest evidence provided by critics of the official account involves the events of 9/11 itself.... In light of standard procedures for dealing with hijacked airplanes...not one of these planes should have reached its target, le talone all three of them."The operative word here is "should." One central characteristic of the nuts is that they have a devout, albeit preposterous, belief in American efficiency, and hence many of them start with the racist premise that "Arabs in caves" weren't capable of the mission. They believe that military systemswork the way Pentagon press flacks and aerospace salesmen say they shouldwork. They believe that at 8:14 am, when AA Flight 11 switched off its radioand transponder, an FAA flight controller should have called the NationalMilitary Command center and NORAD. They believe, citing reverently (thisfrom high priest Griffin) "the US Air Force's own website," that an F-15could have intercepted AA Flight 11 "by 8:24, and certainly no later than8:30."They appear to have read no military history, which is too bad because ifthey had they'd know that minutely planned operations--let alone responses to an unprecedented emergency--screw up with monotonous regularity, by reason of stupidity, cowardice, venality and other whims of Providence.According to the minutely prepared plans of the Strategic Air Command, animpending Soviet attack would have prompted the missile silos in NorthDakota to open and the ICBMs to arc toward Moscow and kindred targets. Thetiny number of test launches actually attempted all failed, whereupon SAC gave up testing. Was it badly designed equipment, human incompetence,defense contractor venality or... conspiracy? Did the April 24, 1980, effortto rescue the hostages in the US Embassy in Tehran fail because a sandstormdisabled three of the eight helicopters, or because agents of William Casey poured sugar into their gas tanks in yet another conspiracy?Do the military's varying attempts to explain why F-15s didn't intercept andshoot down the hijacked planes stem from predictable attempts to cover upthe usual screw-ups, or because of conspiracy? Is Mr. Cohen in his littlestore at the end of the block hiking his prices because he wants to make abuck, or because his rent just went up, or because the Jews want to takeover the world? Bebel said anti-Semitism is the socialism of fools. Thesedays the 9/11 conspiracy fever is fast becoming the "socialism" of the left.My in-box overflows each day with fresh "proofs" of how the towers were demolished. I meet people who start quietly, asking me what I think about9/11. What they are actually trying to find out is whether I'm part of th ecoven. I imagine it is like being a normal Stoic in the second century ADgoing for a stroll in the forum and meeting some fellow asking, with seeming casualness, whether it's possible to feed 5,000 people on five loaves of bread and a couple of fish.Indeed, at my school the vicar used to urge on us Frank Morison's book WhoMoved the Stone? It demonstrated, with exhaustive citation from the Gospels,that since on these accounts no human had moved the stone from in front ofJoseph of Arimathea's tomb, it must have been an angel who rolled it aside,so Jesus could exit, astonish the mourners and then ascend. Of course,Morison didn't allow the possibility that angels never existed or that theGospel writers were making it up.It's the same pattern with the 9/11 nuts. There are photos of the impact ofthe "object" that hit the Pentagon--i.e., the Boeing 757, Flight 77--thatseem to show the sort of hole a missile might make. Ergo, it was a missileand a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon. As regards the hole, my brotherAndrew--writing a book about Rumsfeld--has seen photos taken within thirtyminutes of impact clearly showing the outline of an entire plane, includingwings. This was visible as soon as the smoke blew away.And if it was a missile, what happened to the 757? Did the conspiratorsshoot it down somewhere else, or force it down and then kill the passengers?Why plan to demolish the towers with pre-placed explosives if yourconspiracy includes control of the two planes that hit them? Why bother withthe planes at all? Why blame Osama if your fall guy is Saddam Hussein?The demolition scenario is classic who-moved-the-stonery. The towers didn't fall because they were badly built as a consequence of corruption,incompetence, regulatory evasions by the Port Authority and because theywere struck by huge planes loaded with jet fuel. No, they collapsed because Dick Cheney's agents methodically planted demolition charges in thepreceding days. It was a conspiracy of thousands, all of whom--party to massmurder--have held their tongues ever since.Of course, the buildings didn't suddenly pancake. People inside who survived the collapse didn't hear a series of explosions. As discussed in Wayne Barrett and Dan Collins's marvelous Grand Illusion, about Rudy Giuliani and9/11, helicopter pilots radioed warnings nine minutes before the final collapse of the South Tower that it might well go down, and similarwarnings, repeatedly, as much as twenty-five minutes before the NorthTower's fall.What Barrett and Collins brilliantly show are the actual corrupt conspiracies on Giuliani's watch (see also their article in this issue); the favoritism to Motorola, which saddled the firemen with radios that didn't work; the ability of the Port Authority to scrimp on fire protection; the mayor's catastrophic failure in the years before 9/11 to organize an effective emergency command, meaning that many lives could have been saved,cops and firemen could have communicated and firemen could have heard the helicopter warnings and the Mayday messages that saved most of the police.That's the real world, in which Giuliani and others have never been held accountable. Instead, the conspiracy nuts have combined to produce a ludicrous distraction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
